- Wellington.scoop.co.nz - http://wellington.scoop.co.nz -

Failings identified in Wairarapa water supplies

News from LDR
Drinking water supplies across the Wairarapa failed to comply with legislation and standards, a Ministry of Health [MoH] report shows. Only Masterton’s town supply got a clean bill of health when measured to the new standards.

The water woes across South Wairarapa’s towns have been chronicled, and none met all four measures.

The ministry’s report said Carterton’s measurements of its supply did not meet its requirements.

The ministry measured the drinking water supply of more than four million people across the country for its Annual Report on Drinking Water Quality. It covered the nation’s 490 registered networked drinking-water networks, from July 2018 to June 2019. The ministry measured each supply’s adherence to the Health Act, and public health risks caused by bacteria, protozoa, and chemicals. Standards have been updated following the inquiry into the fatal 2016-17 Havelock North Drinking Water crisis.

Martinborough’s E.coli case, which occurred in early 2019 during the measuring period, is an example of the dangers of public health risk from bacteria.

Protozoa threats include Cryptosporidium and Giardia. Cryptosporidium is one of the most significant waterborne human pathogens in developed countries, responsible for a large number of disease outbreaks. Protozoa can cause illness in people when present in very low numbers and can put public health at risk. The majority of protozoa are freshwater organisms and cause no danger.

At the south end of the valley, Martinborough’s E.coli crisis struck in the middle of the reporting period, leading to failure for that supply.

Featherston’s water did not meet standards during that time, and Greytown’s failed to meet measures on bacteria and protozoa.

South Wairarapa District Council committed millions of dollars in its annual plan to tackling water infrastructure. SWDC chief Harry Wilson said progress is being made on a two-barrier approach for its drinking water to counter the failings. This would give the water supplies sterner tests to ensure it was safe to drink, he said.

“If something goes wrong with the first, we can do something with the second. The example of Martinborough, that was just a one-barrier system. We are now moved to chlorinate the water, which provides a second barrier.

“We’re grateful to Wellington Water for providing the evidence that supports the state of water supply, and what we do about it in the future.

“More importantly, council has acted very quickly. Just before Christmas, council allocated $500,000 to fix our most pressing water needs.

“Equally, in our annual plan, we laid out a $5 million cheque associated with that. The majority of the community supported that, and that’s now what the council is focused on.”

In Carterton, the ministry said supplies did not meet standards for bacteria and protozoa.
CDC’s Dave Gittings said failure was not necessarily a case of pollutants in the water. Rather, it could mean that data could not be produced every minute, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. For example, failure could come down to data not being available for as little as three minutes throughout the year.

Gittings said this was a “cruel” way to be considered to be failing. “If you miss it, you fail. You’re done. It’s really a cruel measure, in that respect. It’s not always that you fail and everything [in the water supply] is bad.”

Gittings said CDC had now taken a further 12-month programme of protozoa testing and tripled the amounts testing through its ultraviolet facilities, and also had back-ups in place.

Masterton District Council makes the safety of drinking water an absolute priority, said Kath Ross, the council’s chief executive. “These results reflect the investment by Masterton ratepayers in water supply and treatment and the commitment of council staff in this key activity.”

A supply does not meet the ministry’s chemical standard if potentially dangerous disinfection byproducts, or too much of substances such as arsenic, copper, fluoride, lead, and nickel, are found in the water.

The report says the risk posed by a disinfection byproduct is “considerably less than the risk posed by a pathogenic micro-organism in water that has not been disinfected”.

Nationally, 76.2 percent [3,107,000 people] received drinking water that fully met standards. More than 95 per cent of people drank water which met chemical and bacterial standards, but fewer than 80 per cent received water that met protozoal standards. The ministry report was compiled using measures from 2019. It informed local authorities on their key points for improvement last year.

The report came as the government announced significant investment in its water infrastructure. The latest part of the Department of Internal Affairs “Three Waters Review” saw $761million available for local authorities willing to take on the ministry’s recommendations.

MoH 2018-19 water quality findings by district

South Wairarapa District Council

Featherston
Health Act: Complied
Bacterial standards: not met
Protozoal standards: not met
Chemical standards: not met

Greytown
Health Act: Not compliant
Bacteria: not met
Protozoa: not met
Chemicals: met

Martinborough
Health Act: Not compliant
Bacteria: not met
Protozoa: not met
Chemicals: met

Carterton District Council
Health Act: Complied
Bacteria: Not met
Protozoa: Not met
Chemicals: Met

Masterton District Council [main supply]
Health Act: Complied
Bacterial Standards: met
Protozoal Standards: met
Chemical Standards: met