Wellington Scoop
Network

E-Mail 'They don't know about our promenade' To A Friend

Email a copy of 'They don't know about our promenade' to a friend

* Required Field






Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.



Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.


E-Mail Image Verification

Loading ... Loading ...

4 comments:

  1. Peter Brooks, 6. April 2011, 11:20

    Before Wellington.Scoop decided to mock the Space Syntax planning report, it should have taken the trouble to find out a bit more about the purpose and scope of the studies commissioned by the council in the middle of last year. The consultants were asked, among other things, to look at the strategic design of pedestrian linkages and public spaces. The aim, in terms that I as a layman understand, is to provide ideas on how the CBD could be made more accessible, safer and more enjoyable for pedestrians. The study is to build on the Gehl report using methodologies specifically developed by Space Syntax and believed to be particularly appropriate for the task. The results of the study are to be fed into the 2040 Central City Framework project – this was made clear at the time and I am surprised that Scoop is unaware of that.

    As for a hotelier’s comment that only halfwits or strangers do not know their way around the city, this comes strangely (but perhaps not unexpectedly) from someone in the hospitality industry.

    The consultants have apparently made suggestions which they believe will improve access to and use of the waterfront by creating defined links to the established promenade. The suggestion that Frank Kitts Park be “extended eastwards to the harbour’s edge” would seem to be no more than support for the existing approved (and controversial) redesign of that park. The Dominion Post heading suggests a new waterfront promenade – that is, I am sure, a construction of the journalist’s not a recommendation of the consultants.

    I hope what appear to be modest proposals will work, because as the Waterfront Framework (which Scoop lauds) states “improving pedestrian access across the heavily-trafficked ‘quays’ is critical.” To suggest that Space Syntax is unaware of the Waterfront Framework or the existence of the waterfront promenade are suggestions unworthy of Wellington.Scoop. Be grumpy by all means, but do try to be constructive!

     
  2. Trish, 6. April 2011, 18:38

    I, for one, find walking through Wellington an uninspiring experience, just following along the footpaths beside the buses and cars. There is rarely a clear walking route to where I want to go. I might decide that I would like to go through the Civic Square or along the waterfront depending on the weather, but I usually let the little green men in the traffic signals decide which way I will go today. Wouldn’t it be much better if there was a pedestrian-friendly route that was actually pleasant and enjoyable. I’d walk that way every time.

     
  3. Lucifer, 8. April 2011, 10:17

    Do we really need a $180,000 computer modelling exercise to tell us where people want to walk? It seems overkill and duplicates the work already done by Gehl.

     
  4. David, 8. April 2011, 16:47

    Why not let people just wander around the city by themselves, get lost in wonder at works of art, follow their nose to a great cafe, walk in the sun, walk in the shade, walk in the rain or under a shelter…or in other words, let people guide themselves and explore the city. What’s wrong with freedom!!!!

    Of course, bureaucrats like us to be neatly channelled like sheep so they can fit neat little pathways on computer models. No reports, fire the damned lot of bureaucrats and analysts involved and SAVE the money from my rates.