Employers have fears about living wage, asking “where’s money coming from?”

Press Release – Wellington Employers’ Chamber of Commerce
If the Wellington City Council adopts the living wage it must explain to ratepayers where the money will come from and the downstream ramifications of implementing it, says Wellington Employers’ Chamber of Commerce Chief Executive Raewyn Bleakley.

“There are a lot of unanswered questions.”

“A living wage is well-intentioned, and we all want everyone to be earning more, but if this is to be approved then ratepayers need to know exactly where the money will come from and what the ramifications are.”

“If the money isn’t coming from a rates increase, council must explain which public projects will suffer as a consequence, or which maintenance will be deferred.”

“And what about the flow-on costs?”

“What’s going to happen regarding the Council Controlled Organisations? They are talking about extending this to them, but that would put further pressure on council finances. And if contractors are somehow going to be expected to follow suit, isn’t that simply going to put up costs, which will lead to higher rates?”

“They also need to explain how a blanket pay rise will be effectively linked to training outcomes and greater contribution to the successful outcomes of the organisation.”

“If a business was going to use increasing pay to improve productivity it would make its expectations clear and then measure the outcomes. Is this going to happen? They haven’t mentioned that. We await the detail.”

“Also, have they taken into account those council workers who are now on around $18, who will want an extra $5 an hour more because they have lost parity? Those people will surely have a case to ask for more. And if that happens what effect will that have on the city’s finances?”

“The Chamber fears there is a very good chance that unless this has been done carefully and properly, the living wage will have a negative impact on ratepayers, the council’s finances, and even its ability to attract new staff with competitive wages. In the long term it could even affect Wellington’s competitiveness.”

“The question also needs to be asked: would the money this will cost – up to $750,000 a year – be better put towards new community projects, or schemes to attract new businesses to the city, which would boost jobs and add long-term benefits to the economy.”

“What’s not clear in this proposal is how it’s going to help our entire region grow, so everyone can enjoy higher wages.”

Content Sourced from scoop.co.nz
Original url

 

2 comments:

  1. Hel, 6. December 2013, 20:50

    Good questions, we will wait to see the answers. Feels like Council dabbling in areas of social policy on an ad-hoc basis.

     
  2. CC, 6. December 2013, 22:49

    The CE of the Chamber of Commerce expects the poorest paid workers to forgo the basics of a tolerable lifestyle so that Chamber members can profit from community project contracts, council support to assist them to establish new businesses and ratepayer funding to create more minimal wage jobs. As for weird logic, how about, “What’s not clear in this proposal is how it’s going to help our entire region grow, so everyone can enjoy higher wages.” The intention is to provide a LIVING wage for the poorest paid civic workers – not further largesse for the already adequately to excessively well paid!

    Hel – Since when was paying a fair wage, as any reasonable employer does, a case of dabbling in social policy on an ad-hoc basis.

     

Write a comment: